 Sound Bite
What's wrong with America's judicial system? Ted Kubicek, JD, says it's the adversarial approach, where winning is everything, and he points out that systems taking an inquisitorial approach are more likely to come to the truth, and to justice.
About the Author
Ted Kubicek, JD, practiced law for thirty-nine years. He has served as CEO of a Savings and Loan, as an adjunct legal assistant teacher at a community college, a tutor for GED students, a Fellow of the American College of Probate Counsel, and an arbitrator. He has authored many articles for publications including: - You and Your Estate (1988), and
- Your Worldly Possessions, A Complete Guide to Preserving, Passing on, and Inheriting Property (1992).
Dr. Kubicek received his JD degree cum laude, having served as one of four editors of the Iowa Law Review.
|
|
About the Book
Oh, those lawyers! The legal profession — in fact, the legal system — certainly has a poor reputation in the United States. Proposed remedies, however, rarely...
Oh, those lawyers! The legal profession — in fact, the legal system — certainly has a poor reputation in the United States. Proposed remedies, however, rarely go as deep as the ethics of the system. America's judicial system should not be a game that anyone can win, regardless of actual guilt or liability. Ted Kubicek, JD, describes the problems and proposes solutions. Above all, he condemns the adversary system of justice which is used to evade the truth and which makes winning the paramount goal. Dr. Kubicek postulates that the attorney-client privilege of communication makes the truth more difficult, even impossible, to determine. The adversary system goes hand in hand with the privilege of communication since neither can exist without the other. He advocates moving instead to an inquisitorial system, in which truth is the goal of both parties, not just of the party that would gain thereby. He then shows how the elimination of adversaryism would automatically remedy other problems endemic to the system of justice, too, such as the passiveness of trial judges and juries. Scrapping the adversary system would abolish trial and pretrial procedures and evidentiary rules that confuse law enforcement and trial participants alike. Criminal verdicts would not then depend upon confusing evidentiary or technical matters having no connection to the guilt or innocence of the accused. This book is intended to encourage the legal profession, the judiciary, and the organized bar to remedy America's counter-productive judicial procedures. The argument will also interest anyone who has ever had to go to trial.
|
Book News January 2007 | More »
Book News January 2007 A practicing lawyer for 39 years, Kubicek here attacks the American adversarial system of criminal justice as a system that allows too many of the guilty to escape unpunished and urges the adoption of an inquisitorial system in which all parties are enjoined to seek the truth, thus eliminating what he sees as the contradiction between attorney\'s duties to serve as a zealous advocate and their duties as officers of the court. Other recommendations include eliminating attorney-client privilege, eliminating exclusionary rules concerning illegally obtained evidence, and putting "voir dire" and jury selection entirely in the hands of judges.
University of South Florida | More »
University of South Florida Once I got started reading Adversarial Justice: America%u2019s Court System on Trial I found that, like a good novel, it was hard to put down. There are so very many good things I want to say about it that I don\\\\\\\'t know where to begin. Author Theodore L. Kubicek did a beautiful and thorough job from beginning to end. I can certainly see why the publisher was anxious to put it in print. A little way into the book, I said to myself that this is material that should be required reading for law students. Later on, I found that Dr. Kubicek felt the same way. I guess that like most laymen I had just taken our justice system as it is for granted and had come to believe that \\\\\\\"it is the best system in the world.\\\\\\\" Kubicek certainly opened my eyes and made me see it in an entirely new light.
I was especially impressed by the way that he took the words and writings of others and was able to lead into them without appearing to be repetitious. The average person would have used such terms as he said, thought, ...felt. Dr. Kubicek must have spent a great deal of time in selecting interesting and unique ways in making the bridges in the material.
I can\\\\\\\'t imagine how many hours must have been spent in research and writing but every minute was well paid for by the results. All I can say is: WELL DONE, GREAT JOB, VERY PROFESSIONAL, A CREDIT TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION. THE AUTHOR\\\\\\\'S RECOMMENDATIONS DESERVE TO BE IMPLEMENTED.
Dr. Kubicek has every right to be proud of his publication. I am delighted to have it on my bookshelf!
Dr. Louis C. Jurgensen, Professor Emeritus
Walter K. Olson, Senior Fellow, Manhattan Institute | More »
Walter K. Olson, Senior Fellow, Manhattan Institute The book, Adversarial Justice: America's Court System on Trial by Theodore L. Kubicek, raises many issues of the highest importance and from a variety of perspectives which many such works do not.
Rudolph J. Gerber, retired appellate judge, Arizona Court of Appeals | More »
Rudolph J. Gerber, retired appellate judge, Arizona Court of Appeals Iowa lawyer Ted Kubicek, a seasoned veteran of legal warfare, though mostly in probate, has written an interesting book, Adversarial Justice: America%u2019s Court System on Trial, about the defects in the American system of adversarial justice. That system, as most lawyers and many of their clients know, puts a premium on winning and sees the pursuit of justice as a %u201Ccontest%u201D involving warriors leading the charge on each side.
The original goal of the adversarial ideal rested in the notion that each side should have a chance to present the strengths of its own case as well as the weaknesses of the opposition. Lofty as that goal may be in theory, it has degenerated too often into legal gamesmanship in tricks of discovery and trial tactics that weaken the prospects of getting to the truth.
As Dr. Kubicek's many quoted authorities note throughout the book, the adversarial system puts too much emphasis on zeal for the client and too little on presenting truth to the court. The author joins others in suggesting that lawyers' ethics might well be revised to place primary emphasis on a duty to the court and only a secondary duty to the client.
The book has the same strength and weakness in its repeated citing of quotations from other lawyers, law professors and judges (especially retired NY Judge Rothwax): the weakness lies in the repetitive nature of these quotations, but their strength rests in emphasizing the agreement among legal scholars that something needs to be done to restore truth-seeking to the adversary process.
The concluding chapter fleshes out the author's suggestions for change, none of which is especially new but each of which deserve serious attention by those overseeing this system before arbitration and mediation render the adversarial trial a dinosaur. The 200 page text is easily readable and might serve well in a paralegal course or as a companion volume in a legal ethics course in law school.
|
|
Pages 224 Year: 2006 LC code: KF384.K83 Dewey code: 347.73--dc22 BISAC: LAW012000 BISAC: LAW017000 BISAC: LAW025000
Paper ISBN: 978-0-87586-527-0 Price: USD 23.95
Hard Cover ISBN: 978-0-87586-528-7 Price: USD 29.95
Ebook ISBN: 978-0-87586-529-4 Price: USD 29.95
|
