9/11: What Planes? Just a Video Composite

Spread the Word

Here is the rendering to scale of the Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon:



Smoke billows from the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Photo: AFP / Stephen Jaffe

Below is the result of the impact, Boeing 757’s exit out of the Pentagon’s first row of concrete offices (back of the impact entry point).


Can a Boeing 757, essentially a hollow aluminum tube, cut through massive steel columns, wings and all, without even slowing down? If you haven’t seriously thought about where did the planes disappear,  the answer is: no real planes were involved in 9/11 as Ace Baker convincingly demonstrated in his 2012 film 9/11 The Great American Psy-Opera:



 

Part 7 – 8:

Part 6 – 8:

For a shorter version, see the 18-minute collation of the most telling excerpts of the series, made by Laurent Guyénot :

48890cookie-check9/11: What Planes? Just a Video CompositeShare this page to Telegram
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
PurpleSmoke
PurpleSmoke
1 year ago

I just lost all confidence in Algora Blog. I will never give the slightest belief in the claim there weren’t passenger jets involved until I get credible answers to lots of questions that involve a lot of basic logic and common sense. Those planes were all regularly scheduled flights. Some of the passengers flew on those flights regularly. So what happened to all those passengers and crews? How many thousands of people would have to be involved with the conspiracy? Many hundreds of airline employees, from baggage handlers, to ticket agents, to air traffic controllers, to relatives of the dead or missing passengers and crew would have to be in on it. I have a lot more questions to be asked and answered, but I’ll wait for plausible explanations for those first.

Peter
Peter
1 year ago
Reply to  PurpleSmoke

Shill.

Rupert's RNA
Rupert's RNA
1 year ago
Reply to  PurpleSmoke

You’re kinda thick, Purple Smoke.

PurpleSmoke
PurpleSmoke
1 year ago

I have to ask WHY? Why use such an elaborate, convoluted, impossible plan involving HUNDREDS of people who could rat on the plotters? All they needed to do was blow up the buildings and frame Muslims for that, instead of going to the trouble of saying they took flight lessons and hijacked planes. They could have counted the people entering the buildings in the morning, and blew them up when any number of people were inside, from 300 to 3,000, to 30,000, up to about 50,000. And WHY did they go to the extra planning, engineering, time and trouble to bring the buildings down into their own footprint? Much easier to topple them like a tree, and one of the towers was close enough they could have dropped it onto building 7.
I’d love to hear the logic of doing it the way “Truthers” claim.

Papa
Papa
1 year ago

The gateway to understanding 9/11 is WTC-7. NIST states the collapse was initiated by a “walk-off” failure of girder A2001 at column 79 on the 13th floor. Each floor was the size of a football field, 47 stores, steel composite concrete deck construction with sear pins. WTC-7 comes down like a rock (office furniture fuel loading) and for 2.14 seconds at free fall speeds (any errors on the details – I haven’t look at my notes in three years). Not even a paragraph in the 9/11 Commission Report. Start there – then enter the rabbit hole. Thanks Algora for your contribution.

Last edited 1 year ago by Papa