by  Germán Gorraiz López – Political analyst

Since the Biden administration sees the possible start of Israel’s war against Lebanon and Iran and Putin’s dangerous approach to Vietnam to prevent the formation of a nuclear arc against China as its priorities, the Pentagon is presumably weighing up the need to sign a peace agreement with Russia. The Pentagon must have already seen its objective of preventing Russian expansion fulfilled by having it surrounded on its borders, while Congress and the Senate already consider the Ukrainian conflict as a bottomless pit that should be immediately closed.

With the US preoccupied with the campaign for the November Presidential elections, France, Poland and the UK became the trident chosen by the globalists to implode the Ukrainian front before November with the aim of provoking the entry of NATO into an open conflict with Russia.

The presence of Polish, French, British and American soldiers in the offensive on Kursk confirms that NATO has engaged in open conflict with Russia. The incursion in Kursk is the largest attack against Russian sovereign territory since the military conflict with Ukraine began; a minimum of 5,000 Ukrainian soldiers led by NATO Elite forces and supported by tanks and armored vehicles, they invaded Russian territory and reached about 10 km deep, while Russia, after overcoming the initial surprise, decreed a special “anti-terrorist operation” in three regions bordering Ukraine: Kursk, Belgorod and Bryansk.

The stated objective of the Ukrainian-Russia offensive was to force the Russian command to withdraw troops from other sensitive areas of the front, to occupy the nuclear power plant near the city of Kurtsov, and to subsequently consolidate the positions reached and use them as weapons of pressure in future peace negotiations. However, the offensive did not achieve its initial objectives, as we witness the unstoppable Russian advance in the Donbas, the worsening of the energy crisis caused by the Russian attacks and the uncertain future of Ukraine’s suicidal offensive on Kursk which will probably end with the flight or surrender of Ukrainian troops.

Russia’s attack with two ballistic missiles against the Military Communications Institute in the city of Poltava, which claimed more than 200 victims, has also generated criticism from military analysts who accuse the Ministry of Defense of “negligence on the part of military commanders in allowing such a concentration.” For the time being, the Russian Armed Forces have chosen to use the three-ton FAB-3000 aerial bomb over a zone of concentration of troops and weapons of the Ukrainian Army in the Sumi region, from which “Kiev launched its ground incursion into the Kursk region,” according to the Russian Ministry of Defense and the “cauldron or encirclement” tactics used by the Ukrainian troops.

This situation is extremely dangerous for the pocket force because it cannot receive supplies or reinforcements and because they can be attacked from different sides, and since withdrawal is not feasible, they must choose surrender or die in the attempt.

Zelensky’s presidential term expired on 20 May and although the Ukrainian Constitution allows for an automatic extension of office in case of martial law, part of the opposition questions the legitimacy of this extension on the grounds that the position should pass to the current Speaker of the House, Ruslan Stefanchuk.

According to The Washington Post, Zelensky has dismissed officials close to the US who sought to fight endemic corruption, among whom the figure of Alexander Kubrakov stands out, Minister for Infrastructure, who was responsible for the reconstruction of the country. Corruption is an endemic problem in Ukraine, as according to the Transparency Index it scores 32 points out of 100 and according to the NGO Transparencia Internacional, by 2021, 23% of public service users had to pay some form of bribery.

At present, we are witnessing the resignation or dismissal of half of Zelensky’s Executive office, including the Foreign Minister, Dmytro Kuleba. These resignations expose the isolation of Zelensky who is burdened by the unstoppable Russian advance in the Donbas, the worsening energy crisis caused by the Russian attacks and the uncertain future of the Ukrainian suicide offensive on the Russian region of Kursk,

Is Zelensky, cornered, making decisions on his own? Zelensky has already become a burden for the US which they would like to rid themselves of immediately. A coup by Lieutenant General Valerii Zaluzhnyi, the real leader of the Ukrainian army, due to their tactical disagreements, cannot be unexpected. Such a coup would have the blessings of the US and, after being accused of corruption, Zelensky could be forced into exile in the U, to be replaced by the Troika formed by Lieutenant General Valerii Zaluzhnyi, the former Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba, and the former Minister of Infrastructure, Alexander Kubrakov. They would be responsible for negotiating the peace agreement with Russia, the subsequent task of rebuilding the country and the design of the new cartography of Ukraine.

Sent from my iPad