All posts by Algora Blog

Here is Why Every Country is Afraid of Israel

Israeli Spies Threatening my Family

South African Foreign Minister Naledi Pandor has accused Israeli intelligence of attempting to intimidate her and her family in response to Pretoria’s genocide case against the Jewish state in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over the war in Gaza.

Pandor told reporters on Thursday in the South African city of Cape Town, on the sidelines of President Cyril Ramaphosa’s address to the nation, that she had requested extra security after receiving threatening messages.

“What I’m more concerned about is my family, because in some of the social media messages, my children are mentioned and so on,” the diplomat said, according to the local weekly Mail & Guardian.

“The Israeli agents, the intelligence services, [this] is how they behave, and they seek to intimidate you, so we must not be intimidated. There is a cause that is under way,” she added.

Pandor’s claims follow similar allegations made by Pretoria last week, claiming that the country is facing destabilization campaigns by international intelligence agencies for accusing the Israeli government of war crimes and demanding Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s arrest at the International Criminal Court (ICC). South African Security Minister Khumbudzo Ntshavheni said her agency has been placed on high alert to prevent foreign interference as Pretoria prepares for national elections later this year.

Israel’s military launched a major offensive in Gaza in response to the attack launched on Israeli villages last October by the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which killed more than 1,100 people and took hundreds others hostage. Four months of bombing have killed nearly 28,000 people in the Palestinian territory, the majority of whom were women and children, according to the besieged region’s health ministry. More than a quarter of Gaza’s population is facing famine conditions, according to the latest figures from the UN’s agency for Palestinian refugees.

Last week, South Africa claimed that Israel was disregarding a ruling by the ICJ ordering it to prevent civilian deaths while fighting Hamas in Gaza.

On Thursday, Pandor said Pretoria’s legal team would be working hard to prepare a case for the next round of arguments before the UN’s top court.

“The people of the world and of Palestine didn’t draw back when the Apartheid state was at its worst; they stood with the liberation movement. We cannot back down now. We must be with them,” the Times Live quoted the minister as saying.

via RT

Unmasking the Lies About October 7

The United States and more than a dozen other countries quickly moved to suspend funding to UNRWA, the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees, a vital lifeline for millions of people in Gaza, shortly after Israel accused a handful of the agency’s staff of taking part in the Hamas attack on October 7. But the U.K. broadcaster Channel 4 obtained the intelligence dossier on UNRWA that Israel shared with allied countries, and found “no evidence to support its explosive new claim.” The Financial Times and Sky News also reviewed the materials and came to the same conclusion. Israel’s claims about UNRWA are just the latest example of what journalist Jeremy Scahill says is a “deliberate propaganda campaign” to justify its brutal assault on Gaza. “This is one of the most epic frauds in modern history, reminiscent of the lies told to explain and justify the invasion and occupation of Iraq,” says Scahill, senior reporter and correspondent at The Intercept. Transcript: https://www.democracynow.org/2024/2/7…

Gaza War, A Setup: The End of Israel as We Know It

by Claudiu Secara (republished)


Let’s say that Agenda 2030 is running behind schedule. And let’s say that that perception is predicated on the existence of a grand bargain among the Powers That Be (PTB) that all the major conflicts must be brought to a resolution, by 2030, so the world can start focusing on what comes next in implementing the much-delayed world management of our planet’s runaway dysfunctionality.

Ukraine is one such point of friction and the Palestinian question is another, as is Taiwan. Behind them there are major issues of tectonic consequences. The balance among the powers is shifting; the political continental plates are realigning on a geological scale of magnitude.

One hot spot that needs to be brought to rest is the Israel­­‒Palestinian conflict. But can that be done? Way over 50% of the Israelis are adamantly against making any concessions to the Palestinians, with the settler group militantly promoting the expulsion of the Palestinians from all the lands coveted by Israelis.

But the method to bring the Israelis to their senses and break their national resolve is the usual method, nothing new. It is what the French call “la politique du pire”, the “policy of the worst”. It works the same way as police entrapment. The poor target is set up to act recklessly and foolishly under the impression that it acts in full control and with the support of the shadow powers.

In this case, it is easy to recognize that the Hamas incursion on October 7 into heavily fortified Israel territory could not have been possible without the knowledge of the biggest spies of the world. It is even conceivable that Netanyahu himself was in the loop. But not, as Larry Johnson describes the conspiracy theories claims, in order to trigger the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. Au contraire. To tar with compromat the extremists in his own government, those reckless individuals such as Smotrich, Ben Gvir, etc.

Just think about it. Israel is killing untold scores of Palestinians and we all are seeing acts of utter massacre, where Palestinians, dead or alive, are literally run over by Israeli tanks, hospitals are bombed, schools and mosques desecrated, pregnant women run over on their way to the maternity ward, horrific acts of inhumanity, utter barbarism never seen by the global audience live on mass media, a killing spree unseen in the world’s memory.

Once you’ve established these facts of war, then you have the next set of events that run contrary to anything the world was led to believe in the last 70 or so years. A rag-tag army in sandals, who could not control even their own country – that is Yemen’s Houthis – brings world trade to a standstill by flying some home-made, or maybe Chinese-sold, drones above the busiest shipping thoroughfare, the Red Sea. And what do the superpowers decide to do? The US armada, the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier strike group, claims to have to up-anchor and leave the theater of war, in which it was meant to take an active interest, and return to home base in Norfolk, U.S.A. At the same time, the US Defense Secretary is in bed in an intensive care facility without anyone in the government knowing. And what does the Chinese commercial flotilla decide would be appropriate to do when its core business is under attack by the sandal-wearing Houthis? They announced the suspension of trade with Israel and the embargo of its ports.

It is nearly impossible to fathom how the Hamas people managed to build an army under the conditions of total surveillance. They seem to have access not only to unlimited amounts of materiel and know-how to build guns and ammunition but access to the most modern tools, such as drones and highly-professional video-making equipment. Under “total control” by the Israeli army, they can communicate freely, releasing daily streams of videos straight out of the so-called underground tunnels. One hint that we are given is that, supposedly, Hamas was indeed a proxy army organized and financed by, or with the knowledge, of the Israelis as a force to undermine the Palestinian Authority. Was that Israeli-Hamas partnership cut at some point, or how much do the Israelis know about their own creation today?

One way or another, some important players were involved in organizing, providing, equipping and facilitating this shadowy army right under the eyes of the powerful Israeli police state. Was the Israeli police state itself, and is it still, behind Hamas, as some have implied ?

Then you have Russia. Where is Russia in this war? Not one clear word from Moscow. Do they condemn Netanyahu for the atrocities committed in Gaza? Not really. Hamas? They held talks with Hamas in Moscow but not one word indicated any animosity between the two. At the same time, Russia is maintaining a very cordial line with Netanyahu himself.

While the mass media in the West keeps more or less quiet, the world is awash with scenes of the dastardly Israelis. A newly created cottage industry in the alternative media space is pulling together former stars like Tucker Carlson and Judge Napolitano, just to name a few, who are now broadcasting the same spokesmen from within the former media ranks, rewriting history under the eyes of a mesmerized populace. The same guys pop up on every alternative channel: Scott Ritter, Larry Johnson, Jeffrey Sachs, John Mearsheimer, etc.

A slow-boiling build-up of emotion is turning world opinion against the Israelis, and not only that – they are now seen as exemplary monsters far outstripping the Nazis in personifying inhumanity. This suddenly makes it possible to reverse the 70 years of the Holocaust industry’s mythology and possibly to replace it with the Jew as the villain, in the old tradition.

So we have Netanyahu squeezed from one side by the highly-advertised corruption charges and the popular movement in Israel to put him in jail. On the other hand we have the far-right settler criminal gang getting away with murder. What a good mix to foster a total manipulation and undermining of Israel’s society.

That reminds me of Yugoslavia, or more exactly of the Serbs. Post World War II, the Serbs had a reputation as one of the darlings of the West, as the best, most balanced model of the hybrid economic system as well as being a politically astute, unaligned, country. They were promoted as the little power who could withstand the aggression of Stalin’s takeover of Eastern Europe, they had a liberal, multiparty system, open to the West, and still maintained a socialist, workers’ economic system.

The West was fighting the communist enemy, the Soviet Union, but Serbia always dared to stand next to the West. And this stance was expected only to be reinforced once the Communists were finally defeated. But it turned out that little Serbia was not subservient to anyone. They claimed their independence from the Soviet Union, but they claimed the same independence and sovereignty from the West, just as much. So our best partner became our worst enemy, hellbent on standing up to the language of vassality from the East or from the West.

A few other small countries, such as North Korea, Cuba, Israel, and Hungary, managed to straddle the fence way past the expiration date, to play both sides and survive for a long time in a sort of limbo universe, where they maintained the illusion of National Sovereignty.

But there is very little room left within Agenda 2030 for such political acrobatics. The time has come to clear these thorns sticking out here and there, and to bring everyone under the system of total vassalage. You go to China, you go to Russia, and you go under the US umbrella. No more Israel or Serbia, or North Korea thumbing their noses at their masters.

The immediate impact of Israel’s intransigency on Israeli society is a shocking defeat. The terror inculcated by the death of their sons and husbands on a level of World War I, relative to their size, is having a sobering effect. The world’s reaction to their atrocities now makes them think about what they are doing to their own future, when even the subservient Germany dares to question their agenda. The settlers are getting their pound of flesh through the pagan demand for the sacrifice of Palestinian lives, and their rabid hatred and blood thirst are being slaked, but at the same time their indictment in the court of world justice is now moving from verbal curses to the actual Nuremberg trial stage.

That’s the story of the Gaza war in a nutshell. Israel will have to face the same fate as the rest of the world. Submit to the almighty; disarm; remove its nuclear weapons stocks; and allow the world to create a Palestinian State. Or, it will face an even greater threat as a unified state in which the Palestinians outnumber the Israeli Jews, in which case the situation in Israel will be even more destabilized. The majority of the Israelis, which rallied around the manifest destiny of Greater Israel, are now faced with a mighty barrage by the military siege mounted from all sides, economic impoverishment, even a de facto embargo, etc. They are slowly coming to their senses. The war against the Palestinian people turns into a civil war within Israel proper. Israel follows the same path to self-destruction that color revolutions have caused in country after country, as we’ve witnessed since the 1980s.

The Defeat of Israel

Hamas agreed to a 3 stage framework agreement for a complete and sustainable truce

Al Jazeera reports:

  • Each stage lasts 45 days and includes agreement on the exchange of prisoners and bodies, ending the siege, and reconstruction

  • Hamas added a detailed appendix to the proposal with steps to implement the first phase of the agreement and stipulated that it be part of it

  • In the first phase, Hamas offered to release Israeli detainees, children, women, the elderly, and the sick

  • Hamas requires that at least 500 trucks of aid and fuel be brought daily into the entire Strip in the first phase

  • Hamas requires the entry of at least 60,000 temporary homes and 200,000 shelter tents into the Gaza Strip in the first phase

  • In the first stage, Hamas demanded the return of the displaced to their homes and the guarantee of freedom of movement between the north and south of the Gaza Strip

  • Hamas requested an end to the settlers’ storming of Al-Aqsa and the return of conditions in the mosque to what they were before 2002

  • Hamas demanded that Qatar, Egypt, the United States, Turkey, and Russia be guarantors of the implementation of the agreement

  • The offer is in exchange for 1,500 prisoners, including 500 with life sentences and high sentences, and all women, children and the elderly.

  • Hamas requires the approval of a plan to reconstruct homes, economic facilities, and public facilities within a maximum period of 3 years

  • Hamas requested that the truce talks be finished before the second phase, and that Israeli forces be guaranteed to leave and reconstruction begin

Remember the conditions set by Saudi Arabia.

Saudis demand a Palestinian state!

Saudi Arabia officially denied the State Department’s statements about the Saudis’ readiness to normalize relations with Israel.

According to the official response, the Saudis demand:

  1. The creation of an independent Palestinian state within the 1967 borders and with East Jerusalem controlled by the Palestinians

  2. The cessation of Israeli aggression in the Gaza Strip and the complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from there.

Under the current conditions and under the Netanyahu government, these demands will obviously not be met.

Thus, the Netanyahu government is a clear obstacle to Israel’s desired normalization agreements with Saudi Arabia.

Palestinian State is Inevitable

JUST IN: Saudi Arabia says there will be no diplomatic relations with Israel without an independent Palestinian state

Saudi Arabia has told the U.S. its position stands that there will be no diplomatic relations with Israel unless an independent Palestinian state is recognised on the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem, and Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip stops, the Saudi foreign ministry said in a statement on Wednesday.

On Tuesday, White House National Security spokesperson John Kirby said that the Biden administration has received positive feedback that Saudi Arabia and Israel are willing to continue to have normalization discussions. – Lies.

Full statement by Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs on diplomatic relationship with Israel.

*

Egypt reportedly warns Israel peace treaty will be suspended if Palestinians are driven into Sinai.

Egypt had conveyed a harsh message to Israel, saying that “if even one Palestinian refugee crosses over — the peace agreement will be nullified,” a source told the Israeli newspaper.

Another source reportedly said Cairo’s message was that “even if one Palestinian  refugee crosses over — the peace agreement will be suspended.” 

No country would allow such a large number of Palestinian refugees to enter its territory, one of the sources reportedly said, adding that it would become “a permanent Egyptian problem.” 

Our Demented Commander in Chief Speaks Again; Listen

Let me translate into English for you. What he is saying is:

“The Supreme Court of the United States blocked me, but they didn’t stop me,” Biden said during campaign event in Las Vegas.

US President Joe Biden fondly recalls his recent meeting with French President François Mitterrand… who died in 1996.

It’s Now The People vs. The Banks

BY AKRAINER

[Originally published on Alex Krainer’s Substack]

What’s the driving force behind the agenda?

I attempted to shed some light on this question in an article I published in August 2020. The title gives it away, “Covid 19: the banking cartel is driving the agenda,” but let me elaborate with a shortened version of that article here.

For many months during 2020 and 2021, the media and “health” authorities have relentlessly promoted fear-inducing narratives about the alleged Covid 19 “pandemic,” sensationalizing the emergency nearly 24/7 while ignoring and censoring hundreds, perhaps thousands of experts who diverged from the official versions of news. Supposing that we were up against a “once-in-a-century” pandemic that nobody could have predicted (ehm..), one would expect a lively debate among experts about how best to tackle the crisis. Journalists might have sought out as many domain experts as possible so we could arrive at the clearest possible understanding of the new health challenge and how to confront it. Effective treatments should have been promoted, celebrated, screamed from the rooftops. But that’s not what happened.

Public health measures – virtually identical in most nations – were handed down from the World Health Organization through shadowy bureaucratic hierarchies that claimed a monopoly on science and truth. All discussion was discouraged while hundreds of experts were being aggressively silenced. Several effective treatments like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were identified, but officialdom was outright hostile to any mention of them.

Doctors and patients have been strongly discouraged from using such remedies and in some nations HCQ was abruptly pulled from the market. In Australia, prescribing HCQ has even been made a criminal offence. Instead, the authorities forcefully pushed the hastily developed, untested, experimental vaccines, all for a disease which was lethal for only 0.004% of the population (even by the overinflated U.S. CDC statistics).

Officialdom’s puzzling entrenchment

Within a few months of the “pandemic,” the utter incoherence of the official positions became so obvious that they lost all credibility with much of the population. But rather than changing tack, officialdom only became more deeply entrenched in their own contradictions, turning increasingly aggressive with ever more restrictive “public health” measures as the media escalated the ‘project fear’ propaganda to nauseating proportions.

We insist: the edifice is sound, do not believe your lying eyes, do not do your own research!

The situation became surreal: how can seemingly intelligent, learned people remain so stubbornly attached to a narrative that was as obviously flawed? Why did the media continue for months relentlessly inciting fear and hysteria over a mild flu virus? In addition to the American and British media, I had followed the media reports in Croatia, Spain, France and Italy – it was the same thing everywhere: all Covid, all the time, with nonstop fearmongering and calls for compliance with increasingly silly “measures.” Did everyone worldwide just go insane? If it wasn’t science and logic informing the public health measures, then what was it? And then it hit me…

The curious case of the IMF loans for Belarus

Back in June 2020 I noted that Belarus’ president Alexander Lukashenko publicly snubbed a $940 million line of credit from the International Monetary Fund. He rejected it because the IMF conditioned the loan on Belarus imposing a strict Covid 19 lockdown policy and a curfew. At the time I thought it was very strange that the IMF would offer loans to a nation while at the same time setting conditions which would severely impair that nation’s ability to repay.

Apparently, a number of other nations received similar offers from the IMF and/or the World Bank, but it was only thanks to Mr. Lukashenko disclosing it publicly that we knew about the Covid 19 conditionality attached to such offers. Significantly, Lukashenko mentioned on several occasions that the IMF negotiators wanted Belarus to do “like in Italy.” Other nations and governments who accepted the money may have quietly agreed to the conditionality which they forgot to disclose to the rest of us.

As of April 2020, 85 nations had requested financial assistance from the IMF. Deeply in debt and with severely damaged economies, most governments around the world needed loans, making them prey to the dictates of money power. To secure the needed funds they may have agreed to shutting down their economies, restricting their population’s freedom of movement, created Stasi-like contact-tracing structures and closed down the schools.

We must aggressively use the testing and tracing capacity “we’ve built”

Further evidence that the agenda is being driven by the bankers was an Op-Ed in the New York Times by Neel Kashkari, the president of Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank, calling for the government to issue strict 4- to 6- week shelter-in-place orders “for everyone but the truly essential workers.” Kashkari advocated that the lockdowns should be as comprehensive and strict as possible and done aggressively, using “the testing and tracing capacity we’ve built…”

Banking cartel’s fingerprints could also be found in the document “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development,” published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010. On page 18, under the heading “Lock Step,” the document presciently describes our current reality as “A world of top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.” The scenario envisions a “pandemic the world had been anticipating for years…” And then we did have that “pandemic,” as well as “the world of top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership.”

Napoleon Bonaparte understood all too well that “When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation.” In each nation, we seem to be opposed by some government bureaucracy. But while those bureaucracies and the officials who work there are becoming the targets of public resentment, it is critical that we recognize the puppeteers behind the agenda that’s playing out.

There can be little doubt that the enemy is the international banking cartel headquartered in the City of London and on Wall Street, together with their agencies like the Bank of International Settlements, the IMF, World Bank, the global systemically important banks and institutions like the World Economic Forum, big pharma corporations, World Health Organization, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI and numerous others.

As Lord Acton warned over a century ago, “the issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.” This fight is now upon us. It might be the ultimate struggle for humanity’s emancipation or our final enslavement. To prevail, we must understand our true enemies and the financial, economic, political and social structures that are enabling their agenda.

Planning wars and more wars

The Rockefeller Foundation document further revealed that they have clearly anticipated our pushback and have surely planned diversions to misdirect our grievances toward the visible enablers of their top-down authoritarian rule. One of the greatest means of diversion are wars [sadly, that prediction came true in the meantime]. We must therefore guard against believing that our enemies are the Russians, the Chinese or whomever the logic of divide-and-rule would pit us against .

When our governments tell us that we face a grave threat from another nation, send troops to its borders or warships near its shores, we must demand they stand down. We must also guard against demonization of other nations and their leaders because they frequently lead to military escalation (think Saddam Hussein, Moammar Ghaddafi, Bashar al Assad…). Ron Paul warned us that “It is no coincidence that the century of total war coincided with the century of central banking.” I explained the systemic roots of the West’s war lust in this article: “Deflationary Gap and the West’s War Addiction.”

In short, we must not be distracted by the bullfighter’s red cloth: the ultimate culprits, the super-predator class, are the bankers: a handful of families and individuals who control and manage the present monetary system. We’ve no choice but to confront them. Today we are armed with truth and information that past generations could not have dreamt of. Today, we can make the difference and gift our children and their children a world of prosperity and liberty beyond anything what we can imagine at present. That struggle is worth every effort.

A random aside

Today I learned from a reliable source that Tucker’s in Moscow (3 Feb. 2024) with his crew. We might get that interview with President Putin after all – and a host of interesting reports from Russia!

The Veil is Being Torn: The Hidden Truths of Jabotinsky and Netanyahu

by Thierry Meyssan via Voltairenet

The group that murdered 25,000 Palestinians in Gaza is not representative of Jews in general. It is the heir to an ideology that has been committing such crimes for a century. Thierry Meyssan traces the history of the “revisionist Zionists” from Vladimyr Ze’ev Jabotinsky to Benjamin Netanyahu.

Josep Borrell denounces the links between Benjamin Netanyahu and Hamas.

Josep Borrell, the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, receiving an honorary doctorate in Valadolid, declared: “We believe that a two-state solution [Israeli and Palestinian] must be imposed from outside to bring about peace. Even if, and I insist, Israel reaffirms its refusal [of this solution] and, to prevent it, has gone so far as to create Hamas itself (…) Hamas has been financed by the Israeli government in an attempt to weaken the Fatah Palestinian Authority. But if we don’t intervene firmly, the spiral of hatred and violence will continue from generation to generation, from funeral to funeral”.

In so doing, Josep Borrell broke with the official Western line that Hamas is the enemy of Israel, which it attacked by surprise on October 7, justifying the current Israeli response and the massacre of 25,000 Palestinian civilians. He asserted that enemies of Jews can be supported by other Jews, Benjamin Netanyahu in particular. He rejected the communitarian reading of history and examined personal responsibilities.

This narrative shift was made possible by the UK’s exit from the European Union four years ago. Josep Borrell knows that the European Union has financed Hamas since its 2006 coup, yet today he is free to say what’s on his mind. He didn’t mention Hamas’s links with the Muslim Brotherhood, whose “Palestinian branch” the organization claims to be, or with MI6, the British secret service. He simply suggested withdrawing from the mess.

Gradually, the veil is being torn away. A historical reminder is in order here. The facts are known, but never linked, nor listed in sequence. They have an illuminating cumulative effect. They take place mainly during the Cold War, when the West turned a blind eye to the crimes it needed, but they actually began twenty years earlier.

In 1915, the British Jewish Home Secretary, Herbert Samuel, wrote a memorandum on the Future of Palestine. He wanted to create a Jewish state, but a small one so that it “could not be large enough to defend itself”. In this way, the Jewish diaspora would serve the long-term interests of the British Empire.

He tried unsuccessfully to convince the Prime Minister, the then Liberal H. H. Asquith, to create a Jewish state in Palestine at the end of the World War. However, following Herbert Samuel’s meeting with Mark Sykes, just after the conclusion of the Sykes-Picot-Sazonov Agreements on the colonial division of the Middle East, the two men pursued the project, gaining the support of “Protestant Nonconformists” (today we would say “Christian Zionists”), including the new Prime Minister, David Lloyd George. He and his cabinet issued the famous Balfour Declaration, clarifying one of the points of the Sykes-Picot Sazonov Accords by announcing a “Jewish national home”.

At the same time, Protestant Nonconformists, through U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, persuaded President Woodrow Wilson to support their project.

Also during the First World War, during the Russian Revolution, Herbert Samuel proposed integrating Jews from the former Russian Empire fleeing the new regime into a special unit, the Jewish Legion. This proposal was taken up by a Ukrainian Jew, Vladimir Ze’ev Jabotinsky, who imagined that a Jewish state in Palestine could be his post-war reward. Herbert Samuel entrusted him with recruiting soldiers from among Russian émigrés. Among them was the Pole David ben Gourion (then a Marxist), who was joined by the Briton Edwin Samuel, Herbert Samuel’s own son. They distinguished themselves in the lost battle against the Ottomans at Gallipoli.

At the end of the war, the fascist Jabotinsky demanded a state as his due, but the British had no desire to part with their Palestinian colony. So they stuck to their commitment to a “national home”, and nothing more. In 1920, a section of Palestinians led by Izz al-Din al-Qassam (the tutelary figure of the armed wing of today’s Hamas, the al-Qassam brigades) rose up and savagely massacred Jewish immigrants, while a Jewish militia responded. This was the beginning of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. London restored order by arresting fanatics, jihadists and Jews alike. Jabotinsky, at whose home an arsenal was discovered, was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

However, David Lloyd George’s “Protestant Nonconformist” government appointed Herbert Samuel governor of Palestine. Upon his arrival in Jerusalem, he pardoned and released his friend Jabotinsky. He then appointed the anti-Semite and future Reich collaborator Mohammad Amin al-Husayni as Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

Fresco in homage to Vladimir Jabotinsky in Odessa (Ukraine).

Jabotinsky was elected director of the World Zionist Organization (WZO). But he returned to the former Russian Empire, where Symon Petliura had just created a Ukrainian People’s Republic. Jabotinsky and Petlioura signed a secret agreement to carve out a place for themselves in the lands of the Bolsheviks in the East and Nestor Makhno’s anarchists in the South (present-day Novorossia). Petliura was a fierce anti-Semite, and his men were used to massacring Jewish families and villages in their own country. Petlioura was the protector of the Ukrainian “integral nationalists” and their mentor, Dmytro Dontsov, who later became administrator of the Reinhard Heydrich Institute responsible for carrying out the “Final Solution of the Jewish Question” [1].

When word spread that Jabotinsky had formed an alliance with “Jew-killers”, the World Zionist Organization summoned him for an explanation. But he preferred to resign his community office rather than answer questions. He then founded the Alliance of “Revisionist Zionists” (mainly present in the Polish and Latvian diaspora) and its militia, Betar. He turned away from the British Empire and became enthusiastic about Fascist Italy. He set up a military academy for the Betar near Rome, with the support of duce Benito Mussolini.

Betar honor guard in front of Jabotinsky’s portrait at the Ze’ev citadel.

In 1936, Jabotinsky devised an “evacuation plan” for Jews from Central and Eastern Europe to Palestine. He won the support of the Polish head of state, Marshal Józef Piłsudski, and his foreign minister, Józef Beck. But also that of the Hungarian regent, Admiral Miklós Horthy, not forgetting that of the Romanian prime minister, Gheorghe Tătărescu. The plan never came to fruition, however, because the Jews of Central and Eastern Europe were frightened by Jabotinsky’s allies, and because the British Empire opposed mass emigration to Palestine. In the end, Chaim Weizmann, then president of the World Zionist Organization, assured that Jabotinsky was involved in the Franco-Polonian-Nazi plan to deport the Jews to Madagascar.

It was during this period that Vladimir Jabotinsky prophesied the Holocaust to astonished Jewish audiences. According to him, by refusing his evacuation plan, the Diaspora would provoke a surge of violence against it. To everyone’s surprise, this is what his friends actually carried out: the extermination of millions of Jews.

Vladimir Jabotinsky (right) and Menachem Begin (left), at a Betar meeting in Warsaw.

In 1939, Jabotinsky drew up a plan for an uprising of the Jews of Palestine against the British Empire, which he sent to the local section of the “Revisionist Zionists”, the Irgun. World War II postponed this project. Jabotinsky did not settle in Fascist Italy, but in the then-neutral United States, where one of his disciples joined him to become his private secretary. He was Benzion Netanyahu, father of Benjamin Netanyahu.

During the war, Vladimir Jabotinsky and Benzion Netanyahu were visited by a Chicago philosophy professor, Leo Strauss. He was also a Jewish fascist. He had been forced to leave Germany because of Nazi anti-Semitism, but remained a staunch fascist. Leo Strauss went on to become the standard-bearer for “neo-conservatives” in the USA. He created his own school of thought, assuring his few disciples after the Second World War that the only way for Jews to prevent another Shoah was to create their own dictatorship. His pupils included Paul Wolfowitz and Elliott Abrams, the man who today stands behind Benjamin Netanyahu and financed his “reform of institutions” this summer.
Vladimir Jabotinsky died in New York in 1940. David ben Gourion opposed the transfer of his ashes to Israel, but in 1964, Israel’s Prime Minister, the Ukrainian Levi Eshkol, authorized it.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pays tribute to his hero, Vladimir Ze’ev Jabotinsky.

After World War II, the “revisionist Zionists” of the Irgun declared war on the British Empire for restricting Jewish emigration to Palestine. Under the command of the future Prime Minister, the Byelorussian Menachem Beguin, they organized a series of attacks, including one on the King David Hotel, which killed 91 people, and the Deir Yassin massacre, which claimed at least a hundred victims.

In November 1947, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a plan to divide Palestine into two zones, Jewish and Arab, in order to form a bi-national state. Taking advantage of the slowness of the intergovernmental organization, David ben Gourion unilaterally proclaimed the State of Israel on May 14, 1948. The Arab states reacted by taking up arms, while Jewish militias began the Nakba, the expulsion of 750,000 Palestinians. Concerned by these rapid developments, the General Assembly sent a Swedish emissary, Count Folke Bernadotte, to demarcate the two federated states. But on September 17, 1948, other “revisionist Zionists” belonging to the Lehi (known as the “Stern Group”), under the command of another future prime minister, the Byelorussian Yitzhak Shamir, assassinated him. They were all convicted by an Israeli court. The Ukrainian Foreign Minister, Moshe Shertok (or Sharett), wrote to the General Assembly requesting Israel’s membership of the United Nations. He “declared that the State of Israel hereby accepts, without any reservation whatsoever, the obligations arising from the Charter of the United Nations, and undertakes to observe them from the day it becomes a Member of the United Nations”. Under these express conditions, Israel became a member of the UN on May 11, 1949. In the days that followed, Yehoshua Cohen, Count Bernadotte’s assassin, was discreetly released. He became the bodyguard of Prime Minister David ben Gourion.

Benjamin Netanyahu as a young man and Yitzhak Shamir.

From 1955 to 1965, Yitzhak Shamir headed a department of Mossad, the foreign secret service of the new state. Without informing his superiors, he organized the secret police of the Shah of Iran, the Savak. Some two hundred of his men came to teach torture alongside former Nazis [2].
Then, in 1979, while negotiating the Camp David Accords with Egypt, he moved the men he had sent to Iran to the Congo. Probably with the support of the US CIA, they now supervised Mobotu Sese Seko’s secret police. He went there to check them out.

As part of the Cold War, Yitzhak Shamir also helped the Taiwanese dictatorship [3].

This time, unbeknownst to the United States, he set up a terrorist group in New York, Rabbi Meir Kahane’s Jewish Defense League [4]. He supervised a campaign for the emigration of Soviet Jews to Israel, attacks on the Soviet delegation to the UN and, finally, on the legation of the Palestine Liberation Organization.

He forged alliances with South Africa [5]. He took part in the creation of “Bantustans”, false African states that enabled South Africa to treat its black population not as nationals, but as emigrants; a model that “revisionist Zionists” would later apply to the Palestinians.

In this vein, he had Israel finance the research of President Pieter Botha’s personal physician, Dr. Wouter Basson. Basson, at the head of 200 scientists, intended to create diseases that would affect only blacks and Arabs (Project Coast [6]) [7].

One crime leading to another, he also supported Rhodesia [8] and the fight against the independence of the Portuguese colonies of Mozambique and Angola.

In Guatemala, Yitzhak Shamir became close to the dictatorship of General Rios Montt. He not only supplied him with weapons, but also supervised his secret police. He set up a computer institute to monitor water and electricity consumption, enabling him to detect and locate clandestine activities. He organized the Mayan population into kibbutzim so as to make them work and keep an eye on them without having to carry out agrarian reform. Thus protected, Rios Montt murdered 250,000 people. [9]; a model that revisionist Zionists wish to apply to the Palestinians. Relations between Israel and the United States regarding the Guatemalan experiment were channeled through the Straussian Elliott Abrams.

Throughout the Cold War, the “revisionist Zionists” did not act in the interests of the Western camp; they used the opportunities presented to them to do what Vladimir Ze’ev Jabotinsky had always done: exercise power by force with no regard for anyone else.

Towards the end of the Madrid Conference, the Israeli delegation brought out this old poster from the British police in Mandatory Palestine: it asks for information on the Lehi terrorist group. Top left: Menachem Beguin.

At the end of the Cold War, President Bush Sr. convened the Madrid Conference to finally resolve the Israeli-Palestinian question. During the conference, the Israeli delegation, chaired by Yitzhak Shamir, now Prime Minister, demanded the repeal of UN General Assembly resolution 3379 [10] before any further discussions could take place. This states that “Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination”. “With an open heart, we call on Arab leaders to take the courageous step and respond to our outstretched hand in peace”, declaims Shamir, grandiloquently. Anxious to reach an agreement, the General Assembly complied. But, deceiving its interlocutors, Israel made no commitments and even did everything in its power to defeat George H. Bush’s bid for a second term.

Before concluding, I’d like to say a few words about today’s personalities.

Ukrainian Jewish President Volodymyr Zelenski and “white führer” Andriy Biletsky

The alliance of Ukrainian “revisionist Zionists” and “integral nationalists” was reformed with the dissolution of the Soviet Union. A mafia oligarch, the Jew Ihor Kolomoïsky, propelled a young Jewish humorist, Volodymyr Zelensky, into politics, while financing the integral nationalist militias that besieged and bombarded the Russian-speaking Ukrainian populations of the Donbass. Refuznik Natan Sharansky, a former minister under Ariel Sharon, organized meetings between Jewish world figures and the Ukrainian president’s cabinet. While Voldymyr Zelensky entrusted the command of the two major battles of Marioupol and Bakhmout to Andriy Biletsky, the “white führer”.

On July 19, 2018, on the initiative of “revisionist Zionists”, the Knesset passed a law proclaiming Israel as a “Jewish state”, with Hebrew as its sole official language and unified Jerusalem as its capital. Jewish settlements in Palestinian territory were deemed to be in the “national interest”.
Four years later, Benjamin Netanyahu formed a government with a coalition of followers of Rabbi Kahane. In 2022, Itamar Ben-Gvir, chairman of Otzma Yehudit (Jewish Power Party), declared that he would expel the Arabs from Palestine. Members of his party launched an attack on the West Bank village of Huwara in February 2023, seven months before the Palestinian attack of October 7. In the space of a few hours, they set fire to hundreds of cars and 36 houses. They attacked the inhabitants, injuring 400 people and killing one man before the eyes of the Israeli army, which surrounded the village without intervening in the face of their exactions.

This brief historical summary shows us that there is no Arab-Israeli problem any more than there is a Ukrainian-Russian problem, but a huge problem of all of us with an ideology which, in different places and times, has done nothing but sow suffering and death. We must open our eyes and no longer accept to mobilize with false-flag actions and other lies.

Translation
Roger Lagassé