How The Atlantic Council Pulled Over The COVID-19 Matrix On The World

via Great Game India

Not many are aware that the Big Tech, Big Government, Big Pharma censorship of the truth about COVID-19 is actively coordinated by NATO’s war propaganda arm, the Atlantic Council. This is how the Atlantic Council pulled over the COVID-19 Matrix on the world.

Since the beginning of the declared pandemic, GreatGameIndia is being hounded by the Atlantic Council and its lackeys. Sometimes these agents were journalists from world renowned mainstream publications and other times newly sprung up initiatives created with the express objective to run such truthers bankrupt and out of publication.

After an entire year of hardcore investigation, this is what the Atlantic Council finally concluded about GreatGameIndia:

Apart from the fact that it originated with GreatGameIndia, there is almost no way to determine the story’s provenance. Are we to assume that some conspiratorially minded writer at GreatGameIndia with a hyperactive imagination pieced all this together in the genuine belief that it revealed the dark truth behind how COVID-19 began and that the world needed to be told?

It is perfectly possible: the new media environment teems with elaborate conspiracy content dreamed up by obsessive minds with time on their hands. Or was this story deliberately crafted by disinformation actors, either partisan ideologues or backroom state operatives, so as to whip up outrage at the Chinese government for unleashing a global pandemic?

Is GreatGameIndia a front, a phony publication created and funded for the express purpose of seeding stories like this? Is this entire episode an example of clandestine information warfare carried out in plain view? How could we know one way or the other?

The above comment is in reference to our article Coronavirus Bioweapon.

Finally, the Atlantic Council put us on the Superspreaders List, unleashing a wave of mockingbird journalism bent at smearing our reputation.

One might assume that the arguments coming from the arbitrators of Science to debunk our reporting would be some kind of an eye-opener.

Indeed it was an eye-opener. Here is what the Batwoman of China, Shi Zhengli argued after we reported on the study by Indian scientists which concluded that Coronavirus was engineered with AIDS like insertions – and that there was no way this could have happened naturally:

“The novel 2019 coronavirus is nature punishing the human race for keeping uncivilized living habits. I, Shi Zhengli, swear on my life that it has nothing to do with our laboratory. I advise those who believe and spread rumors from harmful media sources, as well as those who believe the unreliable so-called academic analysis of Indian scholars, to shut their stinking mouths.”

Batwoman Shi Zhengli

The Indian scientists were eventually bullied into silence and the study promptly retracted. After the Fauci Emails were leaked it was revealed that it was Dr Anthony Fauci himself who threatened the Indian scientists and forced them to withdraw their study linking COVID-19 to AIDS virus.

“Last year a group of Indian scientists discovered that coronavirus was engineered with AIDS like insertions. Now, Fauci Emails reveal that it was Dr Anthony Fauci himself who threatened the Indian scientists and forced them to withdraw their study”!

— Prashant Bhushan (@pbhushan1) June 7, 2021

Later, none other than the French Nobel Laureate Luc Montagnier himself confirmed the conclusions of the study.

Dear @GreatGameIndia
It appears that one of your study concerning HIV insertions inside coronavirus made it to a Nobel prize winner, Luc Montagnier

He discovered HIV was nominated for a Nobel prize in 2008/2009. He was inspired by an Indian group.

— Aube Digitale (@AubeDigitale) April 17, 2020

All the while, when the fact-checkers of the Atlantic Council were busy deplatforming anyone and everyone who questioned their wonderland theories, the God of Science Dr Fauci himself was busy colluding with British scientists to cover-up the information that COVID-19 was man-made.

From the beginning of the pandemic, Dr Anthony Fauci was worried the public might conclude Covid had originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and that he might be criminally investigated for funding the bioweapons research also known as the Gain-of-function experiments.

Since the beginning of the declared pandemic GreatGameIndia has also been following a critical thread of investigation into the origin of COVID-19. The key to this entire issue is what happened in Canada’s Winnipeg National Microbiology Laboratory.

The findings of this investigation has been corroborated by none other than the Bioweapons expert Dr. Francis Boyle who drafted the Biological Weapons Convention Act followed by many nations.

The report has caused a major international controversy and is suppressed actively by a section of mainstream media. Meanwhile, the reporter who attacked our story has been fired for plagiarism.

After over a year, Canadian authorities have released censored documents on deadly viruses stolen from Winnipeg to the Wuhan lab.

There is now enough public attention on the issue and Canadians have started demanding answers from their government.

What really happened in #Canada’s Winnipeg National Microbiology Laboratory? #COVID19


— GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) July 2, 2021

In March this year, GreatGameIndiareported how the Canadian parliament erupted over a heated debate regarding the cover-up of Chinese spies stealing coronavirus from the Winnipeg based BSL-4 lab to the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

The president of the Public Health Agency of Canada has been given until the end of the week to explain why two Canadian govt scientists (Chinese spies) were let go 18 months after being escorted from #Canada’s only Level 4 laboratory.


— GreatGameIndia (@GreatGameIndia) March 28, 2021

Even the origin of the Omicron strain is mired in controversy. The first known cases of Omicron discovered in Botswana were found in “foreign nationals on a diplomatic mission.”

More significantly, these diplomats were present in Botswana for merely four days, and within the short time attained the status of being patients zero, one, two, and three of the newest and most prominent strain of COVID?

The country to which these “foreign nationals” belong to is not mentioned. Why is that? And how does the media not focus on this?

Where we go from here is not hard to see. And for those resisting the scientific noise pumped by the system day-in and day-out, the war has just begun. And how 2022 will pan-out for you will depend on your willingness to expose the head of the snake.

“You Sold us Out to Globalism – What do we do with Traitors in Canada? We used to Hang them!”

A video clip from a video taken in Canada at a public forum has surfaced where a woman in the audience addresses Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and says:

You sold us out to globalism. You are not working for Canada. You are working for your globalist partners.

I wonder how much they are paying you to betray Canada?

What do we do with traitors in Canada Mr. Trudeau?

We used to hang them. Hang them for treason.

And you’re doing that very same thing to us now. We know what you’re doing.

This is on our Bitchute channel, and also on our Telegram channel.

It has been rumored for quite some time now that Justin Trudeau is actually the bastard son of Fidel Castro. A suicide note left by Fidel Castro’s eldest son, Fidel Castro Diaz-Balart, allegedly confirmed this.

Top Left, Justin Trudeau – Top Right, a young Fidel Castro – Bottom, Margaret Trudeau and Fidel Castro in Havana, Cuba, nine months before Justin was born

There are photographs (see above) comparing Justin Trudeau with a young Fidel Castro, and evidence that Justin Trudeau’s mother, Margaret Trudeau, was in Havana, Cuba, nine months before Justin was born. (Source.) (Note: Since publication, this source is now coming up with a security warning. Here is another one, and another one.) How about this (must see): Margaret Trudeau’s Bum?

It is encouraging to see citizens begin to speak out against the tyrants and Globalists that have caused so much death and destruction.

Utopia: The Plan

This is the trailer from a movie released in September 2020. This must have been in the works for at least 1-2 years prior the “pandemic”. The scene is from the final episode where Dr. Kevin Christie (John Cusack) reveals the true purpose of the virus outbreak and the mass-inoculation agenda. The intent was to “stop human reproduction for three generations.”

Fiction? You decide.

Judas Goat is the Satanic Symbol. Is that Dr. Fauci?

A Judas goat is a trained goat used in general animal herding. The Judas goat is trained to associate with sheep or cattle, leading them to a specific destination. In stockyards, a Judas goat will lead sheep to slaughter,[1] while its own life is spared. Judas goats are also used to lead other animals to specific pens and onto trucks. They have fallen out of use in recent times,[citation needed] but can still be found in various smaller slaughterhouses in some parts of the world, as well as conservation projects.[2]

Cattle herders may use a Judas steer to serve the same purpose as a Judas goat. The technique, and the term, originated from cattle drives in the United States in the 1800s.[3][4][5]

The term is a reference to Judas Iscariot, an apostle of Jesus Christ who betrayed Jesus in the Bible.

Eliphas Levi‘s Sabbatic Goat (known as The Goat of Mendes or Baphomet) has become one of the most common symbols of Satanism.[64


Candace Owens vs. David Martin on Trump’s Vaccine Promotion_

Candace Owens (Left) and Dr. David Martin (Right)

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Conservative talk show host Candace Owens continues to deal with controversy from her interview with Donald Trump, and recently published a video of her explaining her views on Trump.

She has publicly stated that she is against the COVID-19 shots:

“I just will never ever let that vaccine into my body. I believe firmly that Big Pharma is the greatest evil on the face of the planet. I am healthy, young, in shape and simply unafraid of Covid-19.” (Source.)

And yet, she insists that her views on the shots do not conflict with Donald Trump publicly stating how he wants everyone to get the shots, and lying to the public by stating the same lies that are coming out of the mouths of Fauci, Biden, and others that the “unvaccinated” are filling the hospitals and dying from COVID right now.

A few days ago, Dr. David Martin, who has been one of the leading voices in the Alternative Media exposing the fraud behind Sars COVID for the past two years, was interviewed by Conservative host Seth Holehouse of “Man in America” where the 1-hour interview was titled Why Does Trump Keep Promoting the Vaccine?

I have created a clip from that interview that I believe best sums up what Dr. David Martin said, and between what Candace Owens published, and the questions from pro-Trump Seth Holehouse that Dr. Martin answers, I think we have in under 10 minutes a succinct summary of the two current views about why Donald Trump is out pushing for everyone to get a COVID-19 injection.

Listen to this short video, and then answer this question for yourself: Which view is more credible?

This is from our Bitchute channel, and it is also on our Telegram channel.

The full interview with Dr. David Martin can be heard here, and the things that Dr. Martin discuss are worth your time to learn.

The pro-Trump view on why he is promoting the bioweapon shots that are killing and injuring so many people basically boils down to three points I constantly hear from the pro-Trump cult believers:

  • Trump is ignorant about vaccines and does not understand how dangerous they really are.
  • Trump has a master plan in place that forces him to promote the vaccines for a greater purpose of bringing down the swamp/cabal at a later date.
  • It sucks that Trump pushes the kill shots, but he was obviously the better choice over Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden.

I get emails daily from the Trump cult believers expanding on these points, and attacking me or belittling me as “stupid.”

This is a typical email I received yesterday, for example:

Subject: Please Stick to Vaccine Information and don’t wander into areas where you have no expertise!

I speak for a large group of individuals in “flyover America.” Your recent article where you denigrate Trump for his statements in the bill O’Rielly interview shows you know little of current warfare and have fallen into propaganda put out by the Deep State.

It is clear you have no concept of or background in Military affairs so please stick to vaccine information such as side effects etc. or you will be losing many people who are currently on your subscription list.

This person, who goes by the name “Bitterroot Services and Enterprises,” then proceeded to “school me” on what they believe is the truth about Donald Trump that I am so “ignorant” about.

Other comments I frequently get are that I am “obviously a Marxist liberal” and support Biden, since I do not support Trump.

This is utter nonsense, of course, as any of our regular readers will know.

Donald Trump is a billionaire who supports his billionaire buddies in Big Pharma, as he sings the praises of companies like Pfizer, the most evil company probably in the world today.

And we know that Donald Trump supports these companies, because he told us so himself. Here it from his own mouth:

War Drums Are Beating

Capitalist Exploits's Photo BY CAPITALIST EXPLOITS


It was around 2017 when I began seeing the ridiculous climate hysteria being pushed not just by dreadlocked physics deniers chaining themselves to trees but at an institutional level.

This, I thought to myself, was something very, very dangerous and which — if taken to any greater level — would ultimately bring about war.

The past two decades have seen Russia sanctioned and repeatedly threatened by Western powers. One of the many threats and arguably the most fierce has been eliminating Russia from the international payments system SWIFT.

Prepare a swift response to Russia invading Ukraine, Latvia tells west

From the article:

A swift reprisal package against Russia – including US troops and Patriot missiles stationed in the Baltics, the cutting off of Russia from the Swift banking payments system and reinstated sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline – must be prepared now in case it invades Ukraine, the Latvian foreign minister has said.

And this:

“If Nato fails to protect its member states or its territories,” he warned, “then it will not just be a military and political failure but a complete mental collapse of the system of values that have been built since the end of world war two. It will mean the whole transatlantic community will be in complete disarray and the glue that keeps us together has failed”.

This horse has already bolted. The “glue” holding this ball of wax together is more like slime and “isht” is falling through the cracks in every direction, while the bureaucrats desperately try to hold it all together. It won’t work.

Now, this isn’t solely an EU-Russia issue. This is a West vs East issue.

“The Russian banking sector would be wiped out,” Senate Foreign Relations Chairman Bob Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat, said earlier this month. “Sovereign debt would be blocked. Russia would be removed from the SWIFT payment system … What is being discussed is at the maximum end of that spectrum, or as I have called it, the mother of all sanctions.”

This would indeed be “the mother of all sanctions,” so let’s see how susceptible the country is.

Well, back in late 2019 Russia managed to get itself into a situation where it’s net public debt reached zero.

In other words, if Russia suddenly needed to pay off all its debts immediately, it could do so just by dipping into the cash on account at the government deposits with the central bank and commercial banks.
I’ve a name for that. It’s resilience.
In a war it is necessary and make no mistake about it while bombs are not being dropped (old archaic military technology) we are in a war.

In the meantime Russia hasn’t been standing still. I know I’ve written about this before but will repeat it here now because it is once again on the radar and the probabilities of a “financial shutdown” this time seem far higher than before.

The System for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS) was put into operation in 2015. This was developed as a counter to the SWIFT system. It is still small with just 400 Russian companies (mostly banks) — including eight foreign banks — using this system as an alternative to SWIFT.

Preparations are now rapidly underway to further this development and resilience.

Kremlin reveals new independent Russian-Chinese financial systems

“particular attention was paid to the need to intensify efforts to form an independent financial infrastructure to service trade operations between Russia and China.”

“We mean creating an infrastructure that cannot be influenced by third countries,”

The article goes on to say.

Last week, US Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland said that the White House, along with a number of Western European nations, was mulling completely isolating Moscow from the global financial system should Russian troops dare to invade Ukraine.

Just the day before, Bloomberg had suggested that Washington could target the country’s major banks and even disconnect Moscow from the SWIFT network.

Roll this all up together with Klaus Scwhab’s threatening us all:

This comes at a time when…

Israel Hosts Cyber Pandemic Exercise Simulating Cyberattack on Financial System with 10 Countries, IMF, World Bank & BIS

Let me summarise. Like covid, the “cyber pandemic” is a plan-demic designed to usher in the Great Reset (a plan originally made in 1992 and titled Agenda 21 at the UN).

This plan we are told is to “save” the world from a climate crisis, too much consumerism, and inequality. Naturally, in order to “fix” these problems a one world government is needed with communism implemented (changing shareholder capitalism to stakeholder capitalism) and a slave class dependent on government (universal basic income) for their necessities. Necessities which will be provided to or denied based upon one’s social credit score.

These are things that most don’t want to see. Heck, I don’t want to see them. They’re truly and utterly terrifying.

But ignoring them could end up being… ahem rather uncomfortable for us. And so we need to/must pay attention.

So while this is transpiring, let me bring something else to your attention because they’re connected.

Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin discuss security cooperation against US | Washington Examiner

“China and Russia need to launch more joint actions to uphold the security interests of the two sides more effectively,” Xi told Putin, according to a Chinese Foreign Affairs Ministry summary. “China and Russia need to step up coordination and collaboration in international affairs, be more vocal on global governance, come up with feasible solutions to the pandemic, climate change, and other global issues, and firmly uphold international fairness and justice in the process of resolving international and regional hot spots.”

Read the following quote and tell me we’ve a coordinated setup whereby Klaus and his crowd have all parties on board.

“The forces who showed up at the U.S.-sponsored ‘Summit for Democracy’ to groundlessly accuse and attack China and Russia in the name of ‘democracy and human rights’ are being mentioned here, and their hypocritical moves damage their image and push China and Russia closer together,” China Foreign Affairs University professor Li Haidong said, according to the Global Times.”

The above is important since the war drums are beating between NATO and Russia over Ukraine.

Now, let’s take a look at something I want to share with you. This is a map showing global trade.

Keep in mind when looking at this map that with trade comes financial leverage and with financial leverage comes political leverage.

This above map, while being a couple years old, highlights the reality of the situation from a purely economic point of view.

Consider now all this trade being conducted and both China and Russia (India has also signed up to SPFS) and the ability of these countries to tell their respective trade counterparts, “Hey, we want you to be paying and receiving via this messaging system (SPFS) and not that (SWIFT) one.”

Maybe they even throw in a bone or two?

In other words, as chaotic as any elimination of Russia from SWIFT may be, if used, it could potentially backfire in the most asymmetric way imaginable leaving the Western-led Anglosphere in a much weakened position and creating a truly bipolar world.

Time now to look at the threat posed, not by Russia invading Ukraine or by some random attack on the financial system by “right wing, anti vax extremists” or whatever nonsense is dreamed up, but by the threat right in front of us. From the globalists.

Cyber Polygon

According to the WEF themselves and their simulated “cyber polygoon,” I’ve summarised briefly what this could look like to you and I:

  • Banks will close for several days and online banking goes offline. We won’t be able to see or access our balances.
  • ‘Debt holidays’ will be implemented, including the cancellation of debts, noting that one person’s debt is another person’s savings. This will be sold as a “solution” to the cyber pandemic and HAS to be done in order to save everyone.
  • ‘Coordinated delinking from major currencies’ will see the end of balances in USD, GBP, and EUR. Individual currencies will presumably be rebased and ‘severely haircut’ into central bank digital currencies.

If you think this last point is nuts, consider that this took place back when the euro was created and countries such as Portugal got absolutely creamed in the rollup to converting their currencies.

The same will happen here, but with a greater haircut and at a scale that would be truly breathtaking.

This time, however, masking such theft will be a barrage of propaganda from the usual suspects in corporate media outlets pointing to dirty Russians and fiendish Chinese hackers, and the hoi-polloi will probably believe it.

A “weapons of mass destruction” redux.

So let’s say we get a “cyber pandemic” where all of the above is implemented causing massive chaos.

People will become desperate, we’d likely have martial law implemented, together with rationing of critical food supplies, and in the midst of this chaos Russian and Chinese hackers will be blamed.

We can see the narrative being constructed to position the gullible masses for something of this nature. Will it play out like that? I’ve no idea. All we see are the various narratives being constructed.

What to do?

Well, I think the answer may be different depending on a number of factors.

One’s own location, current banking, and so forth. It makes sense to have a supply of food, water, and backup energy.

In other words, a prepping, which is weird for me to be discussing since I’ve never thought about prepping until last year. Now, it’s the entirely rational thing to do.

What I would encourage is a discussion on the topic in the Slack channel because God knows you all likely have more or better solutions than I do.

On the investment side of things, what I am doing is obtaining banking with some Russkie banks (while I don’t want much money in banks at all) and owning hard assets as we do.

Even — and maybe especially — in a nightmare scenario as just described the companies producing critical necessities such as we own should at the very least survive, and I’d suggest absolutely skyrocket in value as price discovery comes back.

How Our Fund Is Playing This Ongoing Trend Into 2022 And Beyond

  • Copper – Copper prices have to rise to address a huge supply deficit looming on the horizon.
  • Shipping – Shipping is vital for the functioning of the modern world, yet is priced for bankruptcy.
  • Eastern Europe – Position for the long term trend of capital moving from the West to the East with Polish and Russian equities markets.
  • US Dollar – We’re bearish all paper currencies, but believe that the USD will outperform all others.
  • Base Metals – Clean energy targets require more battery metals than existing global supply.
  • Off Shore Oil & Gas – Offshore oil investment has been smashed, yet consumption continues to grow.
  • Rare Earth Metals – A play on geopolitics and a cycle that should see a repricing of these commodities.
  • Russion Oil & Gas – Virtue signalling abandonment of fossil fuels led by Western oil co’s means Russia is taking up the slack.
  • Uranium – The looming supply deficit promises to pay handsomely when the market inevitably reprices.
  • Gold – Gold sees the perfect storm; the turn of a cycle, supply issues and lack of faith in sovereign currency.
  • Coal – Modern society is dependent on coal, with supply continually growing. Is there a more hated investment?
  • Personal Defense – Order is breaking down in the US, and the unrest is giving us an opportunity to position for asymmetry.
  • Agriculture – Lockdowns and monetary stimulus have ensured food prices will rise, providing deep value.
  • Natural Gas – Supply and demand dynamics coupled with dependency from the US provides a great opportunity.
  • Plus much much more…

If these themes make sense to you then click the link below to learn more about Capitalist Exploits and how you can participate.

Chaos & The Triumph Of Survival

Authored by Egon von Greyerz via,

One of the most horrifying works of art is Bruegel’s “The Triumph of Death” painted in 1562. The painting depicts the end of life on earth.

I sincerely hope that this is not what the world will literally look like in the next decade or two but metaphorically this is not an unlikely depiction of the chaos that could hit us all.

For a detailed description of the grim painting see here

The Black Death plague of the 14th century, which killed up to half of the world’s population, clearly had a major influence on the painter.

The moral message is that when chaos hits, the destruction will affect everyone, rich and poor, young and old. No one will escape by power or devotion.

The financial, economic and moral devastation which is about to hit the world will for more than 99.5% of the people come out of the blue like a flash from a clear sky.

For most people, coming events will thus be like the definition of the word CHAOS: “A state of total confusion and disorder”.


Talking about disorder, just like the Black Death that inspired Bruegel’s painting, the world is now facing a global pandemic. But rather than the nearer 50% of global population that perished in the mid 1300s, today we are looking at total deaths from the current pandemic of 0.06% of the world population! And even that figure might be overestimated due to the classification rules applied.

For that minuscule percentage the world has now been paralysed for the third year soon.

There are lockdowns, quarantines, compulsory vaccines with unlined boosters, covid passports, closed schools, closed offices, major industries like leisure haemorrhaging, airlines going bankrupt, shortages of labour, components, products, closed borders, and for the few people who dare to and can travel across borders, more bureaucracy, paperwork and tests than in a police state. At the same time money printing and credit creation have gone exponential.

The politicians obviously blame the scientists for all the rules that they force upon the people.

It is interesting that with almost 200 countries in the world, each country has different rules how to deal with covid. If all these rules were based on science, you would have thought that the rules would have been the same for all 200 countries.

Or could it be as many observers believe that the politicians use the pandemic to their own advantage.

Or is it more likely that neither the scientists nor the politicians have got a clue how to deal with a disease that creates hardly any deaths in excess of normal deaths?

In Sweden for example, there has been no lockdown, no quarantine, no closed shops, no mask requirement and industry has operated normally. Covid cases and deaths are at the lower range of the European average. Hmmm – so much for all these punishing rules in most countries.

We were told that the vaccines would solve the problem but two shots haven’t so far as we were promised. So now everyone needs a booster every few months. With Big Pharma being both judge and jury plus benefiting from their own advice to the extent 100s of billions of dollars, how do we know the real truth?

As an example, I have a 19 year old vaccinated granddaughter who had Covid in August. Now she has got Covid for the second time, fortunately in the form of a normal cold. The government/scientist solution is clearly more vaccines at ever more frequent intervals. And still no one has properly tested the long term effects the vaccines have on our bodies. There just isn’t time for that!!?

The consequences of these constant changing of rules and shutdowns will clearly have a devastating effect on an already very fragile world economy and financial system.


So if scientists and governments haven’t got a clue how to deal with Covid, we can at least assume that central bankers and governments have got the economy and the financial system under control.

How wrong can we be?

Ever since the Federal Reserve was created in 1913, central and commercial bankers have successfully been running the financial system for their own benefit. But what really gave them carte blanche to print unlimited amounts of money was in August 1971, when Nixon closed the gold window. Since then, President Thomas Jefferson’s cynical view on bankers have really come to pass.

How incredibly prescient the above statement is. We must remember that the Fed is a private bank that totally controls the US financial system. And as long as the US dollar remains the reserve currency of the world, the Fed also controls major parts of the global financial system.

Jefferson will also be right regarding inflation and deflation. The current financial system is now entering a phase of inflation, most probably leading to hyperinflation as I have discussed many times in my articles.

But before this financial system ends, the totally worthless debt must be destroyed through a deflationary implosion not only of the debt, but also the bubble assets financed by printed money created out of thin air.

So a deflationary depression is likely to be the end of yet another failed experiment of a fiat money system which was doomed the day it was created on Jekyll island 111 years ago. Jefferson of course told us this would happen already over 200 years ago.

If history teaches us anything, it is that no one learns from history and everyone thinks it is different today because we are here.

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose– The more it changes, the more it stays the same.

So back to Bruegel. An implosion of the financial system and consequently the global economy will clearly have major repercussions for life on earth.

We must remember that NEVER BEFORE IN HISTORY has there been a global debt crisis of this magnitude.

Never before have debt bubbles at this level in Europe, in North and South America, Asia, Africa and Oceania synchronised at the levels we are now experiencing.

Just look at the magnitude of debt which has been created since 1971.

It took a few thousand years to get to a global debt of $1.5 trillion in 1971. And 29 years later debt had grown 66x to $100 trillion and since then it is up another 3x to $300T.

So when the shackles were thrown off by closing the gold window in 1971, there was a free for all between bankers and governments to create unlimited amounts of money.

And by golly they have succeeded! Global debt is up 200x since Nixon took away the gold backing of the dollar and all other currencies.

As regards the $3 quadrillion debt in 2030, I will comment later in this article.

The very final stage of this monetary era started in 2006 with the Great Financial Crisis. Tens of trillions of dollars printed, lent and guaranteed managed to patch up Humpty Dumpty temporarily.

But it was very clear to me and some other observers that the patch would not last long. So back in September 2019 the financial system came under severe pressure and central banks panicked in an attempt to save the bankrupt banking system with massive liquidity. Conveniently for the banks, they had an excuse for this money printing since Covid started a few weeks later.

Normally governments need to start a war to have an excuse to print serious money. But a pandemic created in a lab works even better.

The world is now in totally unchartered and very precarious waters. A ship in such danger does not require more than a minor storm to be hit by irreparable damage.

Nobody can forecast what will happen since we have nothing to compare with. But what is very likely is that the creature (from Jekyll Island) that has been created by bankers and governments will reach a terrible fate – a fate that only future historians can tell the world about.


Global derivatives outstanding were reported by the BIS in Basel (Bank of International Settlement) at $1.4 quadrillion in the mid 2000s. That figure was conveniently reduced by the BIS to around $600 trillion at the end of the 2000s by netting positions.

Banks like Deutsche or JP Morgan have reported gross outstanding derivatives of $40-50 trillion.

But all banks net the gross amounts of derivatives down to insignificant levels, arguing that these low and totally misleading amounts are their real exposures.

Well, the bankers can fool some of the people some of the time but in the end we know who the real fools will be!

The problem with netting is that when counterparties fail, gross risk remains gross.

Derivatives have been a most incredible money spinner for banks and other financial entities. There are today so many opaque ways of creating and hiding derivatives from the official reporting that no one has a clue of the real amount outstanding. But it could easily be in the quadrillions of dollars.

Remember that virtually every financial instrument created today consists of derivatives, whether it is ETF stock or bond funds, interest rate swaps, forex swaps, mortgage loans etc, etc, the list is endless.

Derivatives function very well in an manipulated orderly system when there is constant demand. But when the music stops and liquidity dries up, only then will we know the real amounts outstanding.

One of my very good contacts is an excellent interpreter of the risks in the system. He has created these inverse pyramids with the current financial system at the bottom resting on a small amount of gold with massive debt on top. Above that we see the known derivatives reported by the BIS of $600 trillion and on top of that the opaque financial system which is likely to be in the quadrillions of dollars.

No one knows the exact amount but it could easily be $2 quadrillion and probably more.


So if we look into the next 5-10 years and paint a picture of what could happen to the financial system, the risk the world is facing is horrifying.

Global debt will certainly grow from $300t to at least $500t. That figure is really a gross underestimate.

We add to that global unfunded liabilities (pensions, medicare etc) which are easily $500 trillion.

Finally we add the derivatives of $2 quadrillion – also probably too conservative.

When counterparties fail, central banks will need to print all that money to prevent banks from failing.

So if my assumptions are right, global debt will have grown from $300 trillion to $3 quadrillion in the next 5-10 years.

But I will probably be wrong on many accounts, like it won’t take as long as 10 years. We know from history that hyperinflation goes very fast. Also, most of the estimates of debt and derivatives are probably much too low.

Still, let’s assume that the world is now facing a timebomb of $3 quadrillion. A very frightening prospect indeed.

Warren Buffett knew he was right in 2002 when he called derivatives financial instruments of MASS DESTRUCTION. Sadly, we will soon see the evidence.

Since all monetary systems in history have come to an end, we have to assume that the biggest global bubble ever also will.

And since this morbid system touches all corners of our lives and has led to a decadent world where moral and ethical values have virtually disappeared, the world needs a cleansing in the form of a forest fire for new green shoots to start again.


As I have pointed out in this article, nobody knows exactly how things will play out.

But what we do know is that risk is probably greater than any time in history. So prudence tells us to get out of bubble assets like stocks, bonds and speculative property. Once the fall starts, these assets are likely to lose 90% or more in real terms which means against gold.

The majority of stock investors are likely to buy all the dips as the market falls, not realising that they will ride the fall all the way down to the bottom. And this time the market will not recover for years or probably decades.

Also it is important to get out of debt except for a normal mortgage on your residential property.

Own physical gold and some silver (much more volatile). That will be your insurance against a rotten financial system.

We have owned and recommended physical gold for 20 years. Not once have we worried about the price. History tells us that governments and central banks destroy the value of money without fail.

But for the ones who do look at the gold price, I think that the correction in gold is finished. There is always a chance of a final move down of $50-100. But that would make no difference since the next big move up is soon coming to much higher levels.

Finally, we will have difficult times in the world. So helping family and friends is very important.

It is everyone’s responsibility to resist the Triumph of Death and achieve the Triumph of Survival – both financial and mental – for everybody we can help.

And remember that many of the best things in life are free – friendship, music, books, nature and many hobbies.

I wish all our readers Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays, as well as a Healthy and Harmonious 2022 in spite of the tumultuous era we are entering!

Dr. Robert Young Finds Graphene Oxide or Graphene Hydroxide in All Four Vaccines and Other Disturbing Ingredients

via EuroReLoaded
ER Editor:
Dr. Robert Young‘s recent paper, showing detailed analysis of both the blood and the vaccines, is very technical but well worth the effort. In sum, graphene oxide has been found in all four vaccines. In addition, Trypanosoma cruzi Parasites have been found in the Pfizer vaccine, which are composed of carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen. The nanoparticulate components of all vaccines make for very interesting and disturbing reading, as do those components that create magnetic effects in the body. A question we are left with is, what is the additional effect on all this if we add environmental radiation into the mix? After all, graphene oxide is an extremely conductive substance, very responsive to electromagnetic radiation. Young’s work also includes analysis of the blood of the vaccinated.

We highly recommend downloading Dr. Young’s full analysis.

Taken together, the ‘vaccine’ components, which include reduced graphene oxide among many others, and which may be influenced by radiation sources external to us, create a toxic chemical and radiative soup inside our bodies.

The ‘vaccines’ are certainly ‘NOT vaccines but nanotechnological drugs working as a genetic therapy.’

The work of Dr. Young so far confirms what the Spanish team called La Quinta Columna has been finding. Find their short videos on Rumble under “Orwellitoand the German Dr. Andreas Noack presented and was killed for here.


Dr. Young’s published investigation into the contents of the vaccines, as well as the blood of the vaccinated, relates to the recent FDA approval of the Pfizer vaccine. As Karen Kingston said very clearly to Stew Peters this past week, Pfizer now has 14 days in which to come clean on the vaccine ingredients, as well as the adverse events, &etc. Dr. Young gives us a heads-up on what may be declared or still concealed.


Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines


Phase Contrast Microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Reveal the Ingredients in the CoV-19 Vaccines!

More in an interview with Stew Piters:

How CDC, FDA, & Media Wove A Web Of Ivermectin Lies That Outlives The Truth

Via RESCUE with Michael Capuzzo Substack,

New Mexico officials admit they were wrong: Two people died from covid. NOT from ivermectin. Yet the CDC generated the nation’s highest health alert and a thousand fake headlines on false cases.

Linda Bonvie and Mary Beth Pfeiffer

When a Texas cattleman, seventy-nine, died last September in New Mexico after contracting covid, his family never anticipated the worldwide headlines that would ensue.

In a ballyhooed press conference, New Mexico Human Services Secretary Dr. David Scrase, the state’s top health chief, announced New Mexico’s first ivermectin “overdose,” soon adding a second fatality allegedly from “ivermectin toxicity.”

An ornament with a photo of the Texas cattleman, whose death was falsely attributed to ivermectin and used as part of a deliberate effort to make that perfectly safe drug appear to be highly dangerous, is lovingly hung on the family Christmas tree by his daughter.

Now, Scrase has acknowledged that his repeated, what he called “offhand,” assertions were groundless. Two deaths were not caused by ivermectin, a long-used generic drug that was emerging as a covid treatment. Instead, he said that the pair died because they “actually just delayed their care with covid.”

That is a big difference.

Scrase backpedaled on December 1 in a little-noticed online press briefing and only after we pressed his agency to provide evidence for its claims of so-called “ivermectin deaths.” Officials had repeatedly said they were awaiting a toxicology report on the cattleman’s death. Yet we learned that the report was never even ordered or done, and, moreover, the man’s death was ruled by the state’s coroner as being from “natural” causes.

Not a single media outlet reported Scrase’s admission, even as dozens, including the The Hill and TheNew York Times, had eagerly covered his original assertions about ivermectin, an anti-parasitic drug awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015.

“I don’t want more people to die,” read one early headline, quoting Scrase. “It’s the wrong medicine for something really serious,” Scrase said in the Times article.

Doctors, scientists, and toxicologists worldwide were puzzled by the assertions, because ivermectin is an extraordinarily safe, FDA-approved drug. A fixture on the WHO’s list of 100 essential medicines all hospital systems are recommended to carry, nearly four billion doses have been given in four decades.

New Mexico became a key player in a broad pattern of governmental deception late last summer to portray ivermectin as dangerous, in tandem with three related developments. Research strongly supported the drug’s efficacy against covid; prescriptions were soaring; and public health officials were single-mindedly focused not on treatment but on vaccination.

We previously reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s tweeted warning last August against using ivermectin meant for livestock was prompted by incorrect—and unverified—information from Mississippi. Health officials there had posted an alert suggesting the state’s poison control center was deluged with hundreds of calls over ingestion of livestock ivermectin; in reality, we found, four reports were received.

But, fueled by bits of contorted evidence like this, the anti-ivermectin train was unstoppable. We have now learned that, in the rush to bury a drug described as “astonishingly safe” and long used globally to quell animal and human parasites, FDA was not alone.

Emails we obtained from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control show that an influential August 26 national health alert on ivermectin was spurred, like the FDA tweet, by a sliver of evidence: just three cases of alleged ivermectin side effects, two involving animal formulations. No patient died; one appeared to have been hospitalized, and one declined any medical help.

Nonetheless, those three reports, obtained by Atlanta-based CDC from the Georgia poison control center, sealed the decision to issue the nation’s highest-level health warning, according to the emails.

Shortly after learning of three cases, CDC’s Michael Yeh writes, “we have evidence of significant toxicity.”

Referring to planning for the health alert, “the consensus was that unless we’re seeing bad adverse effects from ivermectin, we’d hold off,” wrote a CDC medical toxicity officer, Dr. Michael Yeh, in an August 17 email. “Now it sounds like we have evidence of significant toxicity.”

That email was written seventy-two minutes after brief information on three reports arrived in a separate email.

While CDC’s intention might have been to protect people, the alert is emblematic of what had become a national obsession: Portray an early treatment for covid—whether in the animal or human form—as potentially toxic.

CDC hopped aboard.

In an email later that day, Yeh laid out the evidence. The most serious case involved a man, seventy-seven, who had was said to have taken a dose of ivermectin “apparently meant for an 1800 lb. bovine.” He had “hallucinations and tremors, which improved but he was eventually diagnosed with COVID-19” for which he needed only supplemental oxygen, Yeh notes.

In two other cases, a woman who took the human form of the drug was said to have suffered “some confusion.” Another woman had “subjective visual disturbances” after taking “a product meant for sheep” but declined medical help. These side effects are in keeping with what the National Institutes of Health calls a “well-tolerated” anti-parasitic drug with such adverse effects as “dizziness, pruritis, nausea, or diarrhea.”

French researchers published a review last March of 350 ivermectin articles in the medical literature and found adverse effects to be “infrequent and usually mild to moderate.” The study, by the French drugmaker MedinCell, noted that no deaths were reported even after accidental overdoses or suicide attempts.

In view of ivermectin’s well-established safety profile, our request for CDC documents under the Freedom of Information Act sought the rationale for the health alert and specifically asked for the data CDC used from the American Association of Poison Control Centers, to which state centers report. (AAPCC had refused to provide it.)

In response to the FOIA request, CDC asserted, quite remarkably, that it “no longer possesses or has access to the data” because its “licensing agreement” with AAPCC had lapsed. The data might have specified, for example, just how many calls were related either to animal or human formulations; the alert instead lumps all reports together, making it difficult to fathom the extent of livestock ivermectin use.

The CDC asserts in a letter to us that it no longer possesses the data on which a national health alert was based.

An increase in ivermectin calls to poison control centers in 2021 is not in dispute, especially as doctors learned of studies showing fewer deaths, shorter hospitalizations, and outpatient success. Poison control centers often see upticks in calls when new drugs come into use, with many callers seeking only information. Centers also field calls on old, long-established medications. Acetaminophen alone generated 47,000 reports in 2019 and led to 164 deaths, according to the AAPCC.

This context, of course, was missing from CDC’s alert. Calls to poison control centers for use of animal and human ivermectin grew five- to eight-fold from “pre-pandemic levels,” the alert ominously reported. At the same time, it said, ivermectin prescriptions had soared twenty-four-fold—in a perfectly legal trend led by physicians but one the CDC clearly found unacceptable and alarming.

No distinction was made between animal and human formulations in the alert, which was peppered with phrases like “ivermectin misuse and overdose;” “seizures, coma, and death;” “sheep drench,” “severe illness,” and “rapid increase.” The message: Don’t use either form, even as seventy-one studies show 64 percent of 50,180 patients improved after taking ivermectin for covid.

Despite the alert and New Mexico’s unfounded pronouncements, no one has died from ivermectin poisoning among 2,112 cases logged by AAPCC from January 1 to December 14, 2021. Two percent of those reports, about forty-two, involved a “major” effect, an AAPCC bulletin states. Seventy percent were dismissed as having no effect, “nontoxic exposure,” and the like.

One category of those calls might rightfully have been classified as anti-ivermectin hysteria. New Mexico, for example, urged citizens to report any known ivermectin use to the state’s poison control center, even if “someone you know has taken it.”

We asked Dr. Paul Marik, a founder of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, his thoughts on the effort to vilify ivermectin as dangerous.

“Ivermectin is one of the safest medications on this planet; far safer than aspirin or acetaminophen,” he said.

“This is a fairy tale. Disney could not come up with a better fairy tale.”

But it was no kind of fantasy for the cattleman’s family when he got sick. It was a painful experience with a politicized health system.

A “Very Puzzling” Phone Call

It wasn’t a secret that a cattleman, who died while in New Mexico from covid, took an animal formulation of ivermectin. It is a drug he was well versed in using, having routinely administered it to his herds in Texas.

Others in the family also used Ivomec, a liquid formulation of ivermectin for cattle, since news spread of ivermectin’s effectiveness against covid. “Practically everyone I know takes it,” we were told by a close family friend and business associate of the Texan. (We are withholding the man’s name at the family’s request.)

Ivermectin is just one of 167 drugs tested for safety and approved by the FDA for both animals and humans. Yet those who take either form of ivermectin for covid have been characterized as being anti-science and influenced by “misinformation.”

The Texan is one of two individuals who, according to repeated statements from New Mexico officials, died from “ivermectin toxicity.” While their identities were not revealed by the department of health, a source familiar with the cases released them to us during this investigation.

Documents and interviews with those knowledgeable about the death of the rancher tell a different story than the narrative put forth by New Mexico health officials.

When the cattleman arrived at the ER on the evening of September 2 with his wife, he was soon diagnosed as suffering from acute dehydration as well as being covid positive.

His daughter arrived at the hospital several hours later.

In an interview, she told of the surprise eightieth birthday party for her dad the weekend before, where eight of the eleven family members attending ended up with covid. Everyone seemed to have mild symptoms, she recalled.

With her dad in New Mexico and not feeling well, she suggested he be checked out. “My father was not very good at keeping himself hydrated,” she said, and at that point he didn’t seem to be drinking at all.

He arrived at the hospital dehydrated to the point that his kidneys had become damaged, doctors told the family. Lacking a proper dialysis machine at the Lincoln County Medical Center, the family was told that they were trying to locate another hospital to send him to. Unfortunately, he never made it out of Ruidoso, dying on September 3.

But what happened while his wife and daughter anxiously waited outside the ICU, soon after being informed that the Texan was likely going to pass away, struck them as most peculiar.

His daughter recalled a “very puzzling” phone call her mother received—so disturbing, in fact, that she felt like “yanking the phone from her.”

An unknown man was on the line asking if her father took ivermectin. It was the only time she remembers that particular drug being discussed in the hospital.

“I feel like they were pushing her. It was really irritating,” she said, adding, “it was not a doctor or nurse, but mom cannot remember who it was or what they represented.”

They were most interested, she recalled, in grilling her mother about her dad’s use of Ivomec.

At the very next press briefing, Dr. Scrase announced that a “reliable source” reported the state’s “first death” from someone who took ivermectin. While he hedged his bets about the role of ivermectin—and mentioned delayed care—he nonetheless repeatedly characterized the man’s death and one other as specifically being caused by ivermectin.

However, the cattleman’s death certificate, filed at the end of September, says otherwise. It stated he passed away from “natural” causes. His death was not listed as requiring any type of “pending investigation,” and the medical examiner’s office confirmed the fact that no autopsy or toxicology report was done.

But Dr. Scrase’s original tale proved to be very popular with the media. USA Today liked it so much the paper released several versions.

Two die of ivermectin poisoning, it announced the same day the death certificate was officiated. Five days after that, a headline in The Hill trumpeted,“New Mexico reports two deaths from ivermectin.

The New Mexico Department of Health has yet to respond to any questions about why a straightforward correction was not made to the media early on regarding the two deaths that were erroneously attributed to ivermectin. It is also not clear why at a recent press briefing the agency was continuing to perpetuate this fallacy even after admitting it was untruthful, rather than correcting the record—and why they have alleged another ivermectin-related death, again without offering any evidence to that effect.

The second supposed ivermectin death involved a thirty-eight-year-old woman from Cuba, New Mexico, reportedly of Navajo heritage. An autopsy was done, but the results have yet to be released.

While Scrase has acknowledged that the two deaths were from covid, not ivermectin, he nonetheless announced what he called yet a “third” ivermectin death at his December 1 briefing.

The new death, Scrase said, is a “60-year-old man who took a horse preparation. This gentleman took 150 milligrams, [suffered] liver failure, kidney failure and actually died from the ivermectin without the covid.”

As with the first two cases, the cause of death remains to be seen.

According to Dr. Marik, 150 milligrams of ivermectin can be safely tolerated. “I do not know of a single case of liver failure and organ failure due to ivermectin,” he wrote in an email.

Both the CDC and New Mexico Department of Health declined to answer questions for this article.

Despite ongoing requests by the New Mexico Department of Health for residents to report any ivermectin use, as this slide displayed during a December 1 press conference shows, only 29 calls came into the state’s poison control center for most all of 2021. The graphic also states that ivermectin caused three deaths in the state, despite the fact that during that very same press briefing it was acknowledged that the first two of the alleged deaths were due to covid, not ivermectin (with no evidence released to support the third claim).

The CDC emails suggest it took very little to convince the agency to issue a national warning about the use of ivermectin. Details on those three cases are scant, the emails show.

Ivermectin dosages are missing or, in one case, described as “concentration unknown.” One woman “was sent to the hospital, but her baseline mental status was unclear.” Another woman was to be contacted for follow-up after declining aid, but there is no indication this was done.

These anecdotal bits are the threads from which a mythical tapestry about so-called “ivermectin toxicity” has been woven. This myth lives on in easily accessed online articles.

Among them:

  • Mississippi’s health alert on August 19 said 70 percent of poison-control calls were for ingestion of livestock ivermectin. The actual figure was 2 percent; it was not corrected for forty-six days.
  • FDA claimed last March to have “received multiple reports” of injury and hospitalization after people took livestock ivermectin. In reality, the agency relied on four reports, a spokesperson said in an email. CDC officials referenced the FDA “consumer warning” when planning their own contribution to the myth of ivermectin harm.

It matters little that false Mississippi figures were corrected (at our behest) by The New York Times, twice, and The Washington Post. What matters is the hurricane of fear, whipped up by New Mexico, Mississippi, the FDA, and CDC—and abetted by media—made ivermectin into something it was not.

So where do we stand as vaccines fail and cases rise?

On October 28, reported the case of a family that failed to convince a court to give FDA-approved ivermectin to their dying loved one.

“There have been multiple reports nationally,” the website reported, “of people taking the version of the drug intended for animals to combat COVID-19 and sickening themselves in the process.”

Unsupported in the medical literature, the false image of ivermectin convinced doctors in that case to suggest that “the prescribed dosage may be lethal.”

Indeed, the invented peril, rather than promise, of ivermectin has become ingrained in the national media and consciousness.

That is the story that lives.